TORN & GLASSER vs MARSHMALLOWS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TORN & GLASSER wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
TORN & GLASSER: 3
vs
MARSHMALLOWS: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TORN & GLASSER | MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 275 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 77.5 g | 80 g | |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TORN & GLASSER | MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TORN & GLASSER | MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 162 MG | 67 MG |