TOOTSIE ROLL vs MARSHMALLOWS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARSHMALLOWS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
TOOTSIE ROLL: 3
vs
MARSHMALLOWS: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TOOTSIE ROLL | MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 350 cal | 345 cal | |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 70 g | 82.8 g | |
| Fat | 7.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TOOTSIE ROLL | MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TOOTSIE ROLL | MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 50 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 38 MG | 86 MG |