TOASTED FLAKE COCONUT vs RUMFORD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RUMFORD wins in 5 out of 14 nutrient categories
TOASTED FLAKE COCONUT: 2
vs
RUMFORD: 5
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TOASTED FLAKE COCONUT | RUMFORD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 600 cal | 0 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 46.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 13.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TOASTED FLAKE COCONUT | RUMFORD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TOASTED FLAKE COCONUT | RUMFORD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 20 MG | 6,667 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 367 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 233 MG | 9,167 MG |