THIN SNACKING COOKIES vs AMELIA COCONUT BISCUITS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
THIN SNACKING COOKIES wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
THIN SNACKING COOKIES: 5
vs
AMELIA COCONUT BISCUITS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | THIN SNACKING COOKIES | AMELIA COCONUT BISCUITS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 464 cal | 538 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 7.7 g | |
| Carbs | 67.9 g | 57.7 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 28.9 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 3.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | THIN SNACKING COOKIES | AMELIA COCONUT BISCUITS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | THIN SNACKING COOKIES | AMELIA COCONUT BISCUITS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 50 MG | 77 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 89 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 321 MG | 115 MG |