THIN QUINOA RICE CAKES vs ORIGINAL PORK RINDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORIGINAL PORK RINDS wins in 7 out of 15 nutrient categories
THIN QUINOA RICE CAKES: 5
vs
ORIGINAL PORK RINDS: 7
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | THIN QUINOA RICE CAKES | ORIGINAL PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 64.3 g | |
| Carbs | 80 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 35.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | THIN QUINOA RICE CAKES | ORIGINAL PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 2.9 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 0 UG | 0.9 UG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | THIN QUINOA RICE CAKES | ORIGINAL PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 30 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 240 MG | 0 MG | |
| Selenium, Se | 0 UG | 30 UG | |
| Sodium, Na | 400 MG | 1,929 MG |