THICK SLICED BATTERED ONION RINGS vs ROASTED SWEET POTATO CHUNKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ROASTED SWEET POTATO CHUNKS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
THICK SLICED BATTERED ONION RINGS: 4
vs
ROASTED SWEET POTATO CHUNKS: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | THICK SLICED BATTERED ONION RINGS | ROASTED SWEET POTATO CHUNKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 211 cal | 106 cal | |
| Protein | 2.1 g | 2.4 g | |
| Carbs | 27.4 g | 24.7 g | |
| Fat | 10.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 3.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | THICK SLICED BATTERED ONION RINGS | ROASTED SWEET POTATO CHUNKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 10.6 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | THICK SLICED BATTERED ONION RINGS | ROASTED SWEET POTATO CHUNKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 41 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 121 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 316 MG | 35 MG |