THICK SLICED BATTERED ONION RINGS vs WAFFLE FRIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WAFFLE FRIES wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
THICK SLICED BATTERED ONION RINGS: 3
vs
WAFFLE FRIES: 7
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | THICK SLICED BATTERED ONION RINGS | WAFFLE FRIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 211 cal | 167 cal | |
| Protein | 2.1 g | 2.4 g | |
| Carbs | 27.4 g | 23.8 g | |
| Fat | 10.5 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 2.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | THICK SLICED BATTERED ONION RINGS | WAFFLE FRIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | THICK SLICED BATTERED ONION RINGS | WAFFLE FRIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 41 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 121 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 316 MG | 24 MG |