THE ORIGINAL CUCUMBER RANCH vs HARRIS TEETER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
THE ORIGINAL CUCUMBER RANCH wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
THE ORIGINAL CUCUMBER RANCH: 4
vs
HARRIS TEETER: 1
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | THE ORIGINAL CUCUMBER RANCH | HARRIS TEETER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 200 cal | 267 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 10 g | 10 g | Tie |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | THE ORIGINAL CUCUMBER RANCH | HARRIS TEETER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | THE ORIGINAL CUCUMBER RANCH | HARRIS TEETER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 800 MG | 967 MG |