TEXAS SLOW BURNIN' PEPPERS vs PICKLED CHILPOTLE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PICKLED CHILPOTLE wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
TEXAS SLOW BURNIN' PEPPERS: 3
vs
PICKLED CHILPOTLE: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TEXAS SLOW BURNIN' PEPPERS | PICKLED CHILPOTLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 50 cal | 78 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 18.8 g | |
| Fat | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TEXAS SLOW BURNIN' PEPPERS | PICKLED CHILPOTLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 12 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TEXAS SLOW BURNIN' PEPPERS | PICKLED CHILPOTLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 31 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 188 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 100 MG | 109 MG |