TENDER STYLE PORK CRACKLINS vs SMALL BATCH TENDER STYLE PORK CRACKLINS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TENDER STYLE PORK CRACKLINS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
TENDER STYLE PORK CRACKLINS: 5
vs
SMALL BATCH TENDER STYLE PORK CRACKLINS: 0
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TENDER STYLE PORK CRACKLINS | SMALL BATCH TENDER STYLE PORK CRACKLINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 571 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 50 g | 50 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 0 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 32.1 g | 42.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TENDER STYLE PORK CRACKLINS | SMALL BATCH TENDER STYLE PORK CRACKLINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TENDER STYLE PORK CRACKLINS | SMALL BATCH TENDER STYLE PORK CRACKLINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 143 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 4,071 MG | 1,571 MG |