TARGET vs MARSHMALLOW BARS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TARGET wins in 5 out of 13 nutrient categories
TARGET: 5
vs
MARSHMALLOW BARS: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TARGET | MARSHMALLOW BARS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 548 cal | 425 cal | |
| Protein | 4.8 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 61.9 g | 78.6 g | |
| Fat | 33.3 g | 10.7 g | |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TARGET | MARSHMALLOW BARS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TARGET | MARSHMALLOW BARS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 95 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 36 MG | 411 MG |