TANGY COLESLAW DRESSING vs LIGHT HOUSE CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LIGHT HOUSE CAESAR DRESSING wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
TANGY COLESLAW DRESSING: 0
vs
LIGHT HOUSE CAESAR DRESSING: 7
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TANGY COLESLAW DRESSING | LIGHT HOUSE CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 586 cal | 267 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 13.8 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fat | 58.6 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TANGY COLESLAW DRESSING | LIGHT HOUSE CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TANGY COLESLAW DRESSING | LIGHT HOUSE CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 33 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 586 MG | 1,933 MG |