TAIL-ON TIGER SHRIMP vs CEDAR PLANK MAPLE BOURBON ATLANTIC SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TAIL-ON TIGER SHRIMP wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
TAIL-ON TIGER SHRIMP: 7
vs
CEDAR PLANK MAPLE BOURBON ATLANTIC SALMON: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TAIL-ON TIGER SHRIMP | CEDAR PLANK MAPLE BOURBON ATLANTIC SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 129 cal | 0 cal | |
| Protein | 25.9 g | 18.0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.1 g | |
| Fat | 2.4 g | 11.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TAIL-ON TIGER SHRIMP | CEDAR PLANK MAPLE BOURBON ATLANTIC SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TAIL-ON TIGER SHRIMP | CEDAR PLANK MAPLE BOURBON ATLANTIC SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 16 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.2 MG | 0.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 344 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 353 MG | 188 MG |