TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP vs ATLANTIC SALMON PORTION WITH MAPLE BACON RUB
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP: 6
vs
ATLANTIC SALMON PORTION WITH MAPLE BACON RUB: 0
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | ATLANTIC SALMON PORTION WITH MAPLE BACON RUB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 96 cal | 232 cal | |
| Protein | 21.2 g | 19.0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 16.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | ATLANTIC SALMON PORTION WITH MAPLE BACON RUB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | ATLANTIC SALMON PORTION WITH MAPLE BACON RUB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 224 MG | 85 MG |