TAIL OFF COOKED SHRIMP vs SKINLESS FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TAIL OFF COOKED SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
TAIL OFF COOKED SHRIMP: 5
vs
SKINLESS FILLETS: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TAIL OFF COOKED SHRIMP | SKINLESS FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 59 cal | 80 cal | |
| Protein | 14.1 g | 15.0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TAIL OFF COOKED SHRIMP | SKINLESS FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TAIL OFF COOKED SHRIMP | SKINLESS FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 94 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 24 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 353 MG | 115 MG |