TABLESIDE CAESAR SUPERFOOD DRESSING vs LIGHT CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LIGHT CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
TABLESIDE CAESAR SUPERFOOD DRESSING: 1
vs
LIGHT CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TABLESIDE CAESAR SUPERFOOD DRESSING | LIGHT CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 233 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 6.7 g | Tie |
| Fat | 50 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TABLESIDE CAESAR SUPERFOOD DRESSING | LIGHT CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TABLESIDE CAESAR SUPERFOOD DRESSING | LIGHT CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 700 MG | 1,033 MG |