TABLESIDE CAESAR DRESSING vs LOW FAT RANCH SALAD DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
TABLESIDE CAESAR DRESSING: 3
vs
LOW FAT RANCH SALAD DRESSING: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TABLESIDE CAESAR DRESSING | LOW FAT RANCH SALAD DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 517 cal | 117 cal | |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 6.9 g | 10 g | |
| Fat | 51.7 g | 5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TABLESIDE CAESAR DRESSING | LOW FAT RANCH SALAD DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TABLESIDE CAESAR DRESSING | LOW FAT RANCH SALAD DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 133 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,448 MG | 700 MG |