TABLESIDE CAESAR DRESSING vs RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RANCH DRESSING wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
TABLESIDE CAESAR DRESSING: 2
vs
RANCH DRESSING: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TABLESIDE CAESAR DRESSING | RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 517 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 6.9 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 51.7 g | 40 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TABLESIDE CAESAR DRESSING | RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TABLESIDE CAESAR DRESSING | RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,448 MG | 667 MG |