TABLESIDE CAESAR DRESSING vs CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
TABLESIDE CAESAR DRESSING: 3
vs
CAESAR DRESSING: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TABLESIDE CAESAR DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 516 cal | 467 cal | |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 6.5 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fat | 51.6 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TABLESIDE CAESAR DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TABLESIDE CAESAR DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 65 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,387 MG | 600 MG |