SWEETS vs MARSHMALLOW CHICKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARSHMALLOW CHICKS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
SWEETS: 1
vs
MARSHMALLOW CHICKS: 4
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SWEETS | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 381 cal | 324 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 88.1 g | 82.4 g | |
| Fat | 4.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SWEETS | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SWEETS | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 262 MG | 0 MG |