SWEET & SNAPPLY vs BLACK FOREST BEEF SNACK STICK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
SWEET & SNAPPLY: 4
vs
BLACK FOREST BEEF SNACK STICK: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SWEET & SNAPPLY | BLACK FOREST BEEF SNACK STICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 286 cal | 259 cal | |
| Protein | 35.7 g | 18.8 g | |
| Carbs | 28.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 18.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SWEET & SNAPPLY | BLACK FOREST BEEF SNACK STICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SWEET & SNAPPLY | BLACK FOREST BEEF SNACK STICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 7 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.9 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 118 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,357 MG | 765 MG |