SWEET RED WINE vs RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RANCH DRESSING wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
SWEET RED WINE: 1
vs
RANCH DRESSING: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SWEET RED WINE | RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 533 cal | 300 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 23.3 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 50 g | 33.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SWEET RED WINE | RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SWEET RED WINE | RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,300 MG | 800 MG |