SWEET RED WINE vs ORGANIC DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORGANIC DRESSING wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
SWEET RED WINE: 2
vs
ORGANIC DRESSING: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SWEET RED WINE | ORGANIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 533 cal | 517 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 23.3 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fat | 50 g | 51.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SWEET RED WINE | ORGANIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SWEET RED WINE | ORGANIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 138 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,300 MG | 931 MG |