SWEET POTATO CUTS vs ICEBERG GARDEN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ICEBERG GARDEN wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
SWEET POTATO CUTS: 3
vs
ICEBERG GARDEN: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SWEET POTATO CUTS | ICEBERG GARDEN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 64 cal | 18 cal | |
| Protein | 1.8 g | 1.2 g | |
| Carbs | 15.5 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SWEET POTATO CUTS | ICEBERG GARDEN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 14.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SWEET POTATO CUTS | ICEBERG GARDEN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 32 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 23 MG | 24 MG |