SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING vs CHIPOTLE LIME MUSTARD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING: 3
vs
CHIPOTLE LIME MUSTARD: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING | CHIPOTLE LIME MUSTARD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 438 cal | 300 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 21.9 g | 40 g | |
| Fat | 37.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING | CHIPOTLE LIME MUSTARD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 3.8 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING | CHIPOTLE LIME MUSTARD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 812 MG | 400 MG |