SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING vs CAESAR DRESSING & MARINADE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CAESAR DRESSING & MARINADE wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING: 0
vs
CAESAR DRESSING & MARINADE: 4
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING & MARINADE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 536 cal | 433 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 28.6 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fat | 50 g | 43.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING & MARINADE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING & MARINADE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 643 MG | 733 MG |