SWEET APPLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE vs BITE SIZE FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SWEET APPLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
SWEET APPLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE: 5
vs
BITE SIZE FRANKS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SWEET APPLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE | BITE SIZE FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 176 cal | 268 cal | |
| Protein | 16.2 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 11.8 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fat | 5.9 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SWEET APPLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE | BITE SIZE FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SWEET APPLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE | BITE SIZE FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 29 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.5 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 471 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 515 MG | 857 MG |