SUPREME CAESAR DRESSING vs BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING wins in 4 out of 12 nutrient categories
SUPREME CAESAR DRESSING: 2
vs
BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING: 4
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SUPREME CAESAR DRESSING | BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 517 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 3.5 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 55.2 g | 40 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SUPREME CAESAR DRESSING | BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SUPREME CAESAR DRESSING | BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 67 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 897 MG | 967 MG |