SUPER PLANT-BASED CAESAR DRESSING vs DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SUPER PLANT-BASED CAESAR DRESSING wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
SUPER PLANT-BASED CAESAR DRESSING: 6
vs
DRESSING: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SUPER PLANT-BASED CAESAR DRESSING | DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 300 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fat | 43.3 g | 26.7 g | |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SUPER PLANT-BASED CAESAR DRESSING | DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SUPER PLANT-BASED CAESAR DRESSING | DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 33 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 33 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 700 MG | 867 MG |