SUPER FRUIT DRESSING vs LITE VINAIGRETTE DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SUPER FRUIT DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
SUPER FRUIT DRESSING: 3
vs
LITE VINAIGRETTE DRESSING: 1
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SUPER FRUIT DRESSING | LITE VINAIGRETTE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 33 cal | 167 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 10 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 11.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SUPER FRUIT DRESSING | LITE VINAIGRETTE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SUPER FRUIT DRESSING | LITE VINAIGRETTE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 150 MG | 800 MG |