SUGAR ROLLED STYLE CONES vs ANCIENT GRAINS FLATBREAD CRACKERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ANCIENT GRAINS FLATBREAD CRACKERS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
SUGAR ROLLED STYLE CONES: 3
vs
ANCIENT GRAINS FLATBREAD CRACKERS: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SUGAR ROLLED STYLE CONES | ANCIENT GRAINS FLATBREAD CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 409 cal | 417 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 11.1 g | |
| Carbs | 90.9 g | 75 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 9.7 g | |
| Fiber | 9.1 g | 5.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SUGAR ROLLED STYLE CONES | ANCIENT GRAINS FLATBREAD CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 58 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 147 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 136 MG | 639 MG |