SUGAR FREE RANCH DRESSING vs CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SUGAR FREE RANCH DRESSING wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
SUGAR FREE RANCH DRESSING: 4
vs
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 1
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SUGAR FREE RANCH DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 117 cal | 267 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 13.3 g | 26.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SUGAR FREE RANCH DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SUGAR FREE RANCH DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 900 MG | 833 MG |