SUBMARINE DRESSING vs CHAMPAGNE DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHAMPAGNE DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
SUBMARINE DRESSING: 0
vs
CHAMPAGNE DRESSING: 3
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SUBMARINE DRESSING | CHAMPAGNE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 667 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 6.7 g | Tie |
| Fat | 73.3 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SUBMARINE DRESSING | CHAMPAGNE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SUBMARINE DRESSING | CHAMPAGNE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 400 MG | 1,367 MG |