STONERIDGE RANCH vs HARD SALAME
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
STONERIDGE RANCH wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
STONERIDGE RANCH: 5
vs
HARD SALAME: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | STONERIDGE RANCH | HARD SALAME | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 306 cal | 393 cal | |
| Protein | 21.2 g | 25 g | |
| Carbs | 2.4 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 23.5 g | 32.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | STONERIDGE RANCH | HARD SALAME | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | STONERIDGE RANCH | HARD SALAME | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 800 MG | 1,536 MG |