SQUEEZE WHIPPED DRESSING vs RANCH BACON DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SQUEEZE WHIPPED DRESSING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
SQUEEZE WHIPPED DRESSING: 4
vs
RANCH BACON DRESSING: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SQUEEZE WHIPPED DRESSING | RANCH BACON DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 467 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 20 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fat | 30 g | 46.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SQUEEZE WHIPPED DRESSING | RANCH BACON DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SQUEEZE WHIPPED DRESSING | RANCH BACON DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 67 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 800 MG | 767 MG |