SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH vs NATURAL APPLE RINGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH: 5
vs
NATURAL APPLE RINGS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH | NATURAL APPLE RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 67 cal | 300 cal | |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 15.6 g | 75 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 12.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH | NATURAL APPLE RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 13.3 MG | 3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH | NATURAL APPLE RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 50 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 117 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 350 MG |