SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH: 6
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 67 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 15.6 g | 60 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 30 g | |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 13.3 MG | 6 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 128 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |