SOUR WATERMELON COTTON CANDY vs MINI MARSHMALLOWS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MINI MARSHMALLOWS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
SOUR WATERMELON COTTON CANDY: 0
vs
MINI MARSHMALLOWS: 4
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SOUR WATERMELON COTTON CANDY | MINI MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 381 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 95.2 g | 83.3 g | |
| Fat | 4.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SOUR WATERMELON COTTON CANDY | MINI MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 83 MG |