SOUR FRUIT SLICES vs MARSHMALLOW CHICKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARSHMALLOW CHICKS wins in 3 out of 12 nutrient categories
SOUR FRUIT SLICES: 0
vs
MARSHMALLOW CHICKS: 3
(9 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SOUR FRUIT SLICES | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 350 cal | 324 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 85 g | 82.4 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SOUR FRUIT SLICES | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SOUR FRUIT SLICES | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |