SNAPPY GRILLERS vs CHIPOTLE BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHIPOTLE BEEF FRANKS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
SNAPPY GRILLERS: 2
vs
CHIPOTLE BEEF FRANKS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SNAPPY GRILLERS | CHIPOTLE BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 288 cal | 306 cal | |
| Protein | 12.1 g | 15.3 g | |
| Carbs | 1.5 g | 4.7 g | |
| Fat | 25.8 g | 24.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SNAPPY GRILLERS | CHIPOTLE BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4.2 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SNAPPY GRILLERS | CHIPOTLE BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.1 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 848 MG | 11,060 MG |