SNACKABLE MARSHMALLOWS vs SOUR BELTS CANDY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SNACKABLE MARSHMALLOWS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
SNACKABLE MARSHMALLOWS: 5
vs
SOUR BELTS CANDY: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SNACKABLE MARSHMALLOWS | SOUR BELTS CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 267 cal | 375 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 2.5 g | |
| Carbs | 63.3 g | 82.5 g | |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 2.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SNACKABLE MARSHMALLOWS | SOUR BELTS CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SNACKABLE MARSHMALLOWS | SOUR BELTS CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 17 MG | 30 MG |