SNACK SIZED MARSHMALLOWS vs RED GEMS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RED GEMS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
SNACK SIZED MARSHMALLOWS: 2
vs
RED GEMS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SNACK SIZED MARSHMALLOWS | RED GEMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 300 cal | 467 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3.3 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 76.7 g | 73.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SNACK SIZED MARSHMALLOWS | RED GEMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SNACK SIZED MARSHMALLOWS | RED GEMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 133 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 17 MG | 50 MG |