SMITHFIELD vs CLASSIC FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC FRANKS wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
SMITHFIELD: 2
vs
CLASSIC FRANKS: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SMITHFIELD | CLASSIC FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 267 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 11.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 24.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SMITHFIELD | CLASSIC FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SMITHFIELD | CLASSIC FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 756 MG |