SMALL KEY WEST PINK SHRIMP vs SKINLESS & BONELESS PACIFIC COD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKINLESS & BONELESS PACIFIC COD wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
SMALL KEY WEST PINK SHRIMP: 1
vs
SKINLESS & BONELESS PACIFIC COD: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SMALL KEY WEST PINK SHRIMP | SKINLESS & BONELESS PACIFIC COD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 cal | 53 cal | |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 12.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SMALL KEY WEST PINK SHRIMP | SKINLESS & BONELESS PACIFIC COD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SMALL KEY WEST PINK SHRIMP | SKINLESS & BONELESS PACIFIC COD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 116 MG | 637 MG |