SMALL KEY WEST PINK SHRIMP vs COOKED TAIL OFF WHITE SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED TAIL OFF WHITE SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
SMALL KEY WEST PINK SHRIMP: 3
vs
COOKED TAIL OFF WHITE SHRIMP: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SMALL KEY WEST PINK SHRIMP | COOKED TAIL OFF WHITE SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 23.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SMALL KEY WEST PINK SHRIMP | COOKED TAIL OFF WHITE SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SMALL KEY WEST PINK SHRIMP | COOKED TAIL OFF WHITE SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 116 MG | 208 MG |