SLURPEE vs MARSHMALLOW
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARSHMALLOW wins in 2 out of 11 nutrient categories
SLURPEE: 1
vs
MARSHMALLOW: 2
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SLURPEE | MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 312 cal | 324 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 87.5 g | 82.4 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SLURPEE | MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SLURPEE | MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |