SLOW ROAST CHOPPED CHICK'N vs MAPLE HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW ROAST CHOPPED CHICK'N wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
SLOW ROAST CHOPPED CHICK'N: 4
vs
MAPLE HAM: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SLOW ROAST CHOPPED CHICK'N | MAPLE HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 118 cal | 125 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 19.6 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SLOW ROAST CHOPPED CHICK'N | MAPLE HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SLOW ROAST CHOPPED CHICK'N | MAPLE HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.1 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 24 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 424 MG | 696 MG |