SLOW COOKER SAUCE vs RED COOKING WINE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RED COOKING WINE wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
SLOW COOKER SAUCE: 2
vs
RED COOKING WINE: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SLOW COOKER SAUCE | RED COOKING WINE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 74 cal | 67 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 17.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SLOW COOKER SAUCE | RED COOKING WINE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SLOW COOKER SAUCE | RED COOKING WINE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 529 MG | 633 MG |