SLOW COOKED HAM vs BOLOGNA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW COOKED HAM wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
SLOW COOKED HAM: 5
vs
BOLOGNA: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SLOW COOKED HAM | BOLOGNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 19.6 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 23.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SLOW COOKED HAM | BOLOGNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 26.8 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SLOW COOKED HAM | BOLOGNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 4.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,125 MG | 1,018 MG |