SLOW COOKED CORNED BEEF vs VIRGINIA HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
VIRGINIA HAM wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
SLOW COOKED CORNED BEEF: 3
vs
VIRGINIA HAM: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SLOW COOKED CORNED BEEF | VIRGINIA HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SLOW COOKED CORNED BEEF | VIRGINIA HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SLOW COOKED CORNED BEEF | VIRGINIA HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 286 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 554 MG | 1,054 MG |